Jim
Stigler, a professor of psychology at UCLA,
sums up the difference in learning approach between the East and the West in
this way:
“For
the most part in American culture, intellectual struggle in schoolchildren is
seen as an indicator of weakness, while in Eastern cultures it is not only
tolerated but is often used to measure emotional strength.”
He
witnessed how Japanese classroom was conducted, whereby the teacher called upon
a weaker student to draw three-dimensional cubes on the board. The kid
struggled in making it look right and in the end, he succeeded and received
applause from his classmates. This is the opposite of the American classrooms
whereby the best kid is usually given the opportunity to share in front of the
whole class.
On the
other hand, Jin Li, a professor at Brown
University, had in the past decade studied the learning beliefs of Taiwanese
and Americans. Here is what she has found:
Americans:
“The idea of intelligence is believed in the West as a cause. She (the mother)
is telling him (the son) that there is something in him, in his mind, that
enables him to do what he does.”
Asians:
“It resides in what they do, but not who they are, what they’re born with.”
Li
shared a conversation between a mother and her son who had won first place in a
piano competition, that it was his effort and the persistence he put into
practicing the piano that led him to the achievement.
The
West looks at struggle as a weakness while the East looks at it as a strength.
By viewing it as a strength, we are more willing to put in effort and accept
that it is a part of the challenges that we need to face in learning.
Read original
article here
No comments:
Post a Comment