Inquiry-based Learning vs. Standardized Content

Which is more effective in aiding the learning process and preparing the young ones for their future? Inquiry-based learning? Or standardized content?

In recent years, there is much discussion among educators on the relevant of standardized content in today’s world, whether it still functions as well as during the old times and whether it encourages critical thinking skills.

Given the rise in the focus on grades instead of knowledge and skills gained, it makes one ponder whether the children are well-prepared to face the challenging world that requires critical and innovative thinking.

As standardized information and testings may put a barrier to innovative teaching and addressing students’ needs, how can we address this learning process? How can we make use of the inquiry-based process to the benefits of our children?

As Thom Markham (speaker, writer, psychologist, school redesign consultant, and the author of the Project Based Learning Design and Coaching Guide: Expert tools for inquiry and innovation for K-12 educators) suggests, a teacher can help to move the dialogue forward by focusing on project-based learning, which is the most effective learning method of inquiry-based learning at the moment.

Here is a diagram on inquiry-based learning created by educators in Australia.

http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2013/10/the-inquiry-process/

Based on the above graph, inquiry-based learning shows some resemblance to theme-based learning (thematic approach). Both the approaches – inquiry-based and thematic – can be integrated to assist in effective learning in children.