A
study published in the Journal
of Educational Psychology revealed that “of those students in the top
1% of spatial talent, roughly 70% were not in the top 1% in either math or
verbal talent – showing a large fraction of students having the high spatial
but lower math/verbal profile”.
What’s
more, a new study published in Psychological
Science has found a solid link between early spatial talent and creativity
in adult life.
What
is spatial talent?
It is
“the ability to generate, retain, retrieve, and transform well-structured
visual images”.
In
other words, it is the ability to imagine in the minds eye and mentally
manipulate objects that leads to great invention. Think Albert Einstein, Nikola
Tesla and Thomas Edison, all of whom had extraordinary spatial talent. This
kind of talent is often found in most of the artists, engineers, architects and
surgeons.
Unfortunately,
as spatially talented students scored low in math or verbal assessments, they
are often been neglected in the school systems. Their creative potential is
then left unnoticed and under-developed as most of the standardized tests tend
to focus more on math, verbal and writing skills, but not inclusive of a
spatial measure.
How
can we recognize this spatial talent in children then?
Being
observant and giving the children the freedom of expression may help in
developing their spatial talent. Isn’t it a great thing to do if we give them
the space to let their imagination goes wild, instead of putting all the focus
on achieving high scores in standardized tests?
As we
often hear, everyone has his talent and call on Earth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a deeper look into spatial creativity and related research, read the
original article Why
We Need to Value Students’ Spatial Creativity by Jonathan Wai, researcher
at the Duke University Talent
Identification Program and Case Western Reserve University and writer of “Finding the Next Einstein: Why Smart is
Relative” for Psychology Today.
No comments:
Post a Comment